 |
 |
|||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||
|
 |
|
||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Objective: to review the feasibility and experience of the EUROCARE recommendations on drinking and driving (session 2). Design: Eurocare Recommendations will be circulated before the start of the workshop and presented in a schematic way. A discussion will follow each recommendation or group of recommendations with the participation of experts who have experience in the feasibility and effectiveness of them. |
||
|
Subject (Links to /papers/presentations)
|
Speaker/Organisation
|
|
 |
Recommendation 5: Treatment schemes (brief intervention in traffic casualties). |
Alicia Rodriguez-Martos Dauer |
|
Recommendation 6: Responsible Serving of Alcoholic Beverages: how RSA can contribute to prevent Drinking & Driving: Designated driver campaigns: prevention or promotion? |
Alicia Rodriguez-Martos Dauer |
| Wim van Dalen | ||
|
Recommendation 7: Is independence from industry feasible? | Wim van Dalen |
|
Recommendation 8-9: Feasibility of awareness campaigns and challenges for a monitoring system (presentation) |
Andrew McNeill, Institute of Alcohol Studies, London, England |
1996 - 2005 Eurocare
